2. Re: 24 bit vs. 16 bit

["John Hartog" hartogj]

>Walt wrote:
> 24bit is very low on my priority list for upgrading my equipment.
> Actually I'm not buying much in new audio equipment, no need. This is
> particularly true as most of my audio gets handed to others on audio
> CDs, which are 16bit. I've had no requests that I give these folks 24
> bit, but plenty of requests for more and more of the 16 bit recordings

Ok Walt, so you already have an excellent recorder that does for you
what you need it to do - even without high bit depth.  But what if
your recorder did have a 24bit option =96 would you ever use it?

John Hartog