naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Understanding microphone tests

Subject: Re: Understanding microphone tests
From: "Rob Danielson" danielson_rob
Date: Fri Apr 13, 2007 12:56 am ((PDT))
At 11:35 PM -0400 4/12/07, Steve Pelikan wrote:
>Friends:
>
>I've been slowly going through the great tests/comparisons of
>microphones and recorders that people have made available. These are
>very helpful, but I still have lots of questions about what I'm looking
>at and hearing.
>
>Here's a starter question. I viewed Rob Danielson's comparison of Rode
>NT1-A's with Shure 183's and  Rode NT-4's. This is at the page:
>
>http://www.uwm.edu/~type/audio-art-tech-gallery/pages/page_37.html
>
>The overall noise levels I hear agree qualitatively with the output
>noise spec's I've found for these microphones. I was fascinated to hear
>the different quality of the noises.
>
>It seems that the power spectrum (is that what it is called?) of the
>NT1-A recordings all have a large peak at approx 13 KHz (independent of
>preamp used and recorder) while this peak is absent from the displays
>for the other microphones.
>
>Based on what I can see, I attribute the signal the the NT1-A's. Is that
>reasonable? Am I correct in thinking that this signal is pretty
>significant in magnitude but not reflected in the A-weighted output
>noise measure because it is either 1) at a pretty high frequency or 2)
>in a narrow frequency range?
>
>Is this sort of signal generally common in many microphones or usually
>unique to particular models (eg. NT1-A's) or is it more reasonable to
>attribute it  to the individual microphones used and not to entire models?
>
>
>Thanks,
>Steve Pelikan
>

Hi Steve--
Yes, there is a peak in Rode NT1-A's response curve up there (wish
_I_ could hear it).  My attic studio has high Hz pollution in the
minimum background sounds even after I turn everything off and run
the recorders on batteries.  The recent test we did in the isolation
booth should not have this high-Hz pollution so it should be better
able to show what Rode's is doing around 13KHz, noise-wise, at least.

Here a test combining the same mics and recorder at the same gain in
the two different settings:
NT1-A's-> 744T (in the isolation booth mar 07) vs, NT1-A's-> 744T (my
attic studio in Dec 06 )  In theory, the differences you hear should
be entirely from the locations, not the gear. Both have 16/48K tracks
if you want to analyze them:
http://www.uwm.edu/~type/audio-art-tech-gallery/mediafiles/NT1A-744T_IsoBoo=
th_AtticStudios.mov

I think the "power spectrum" is regarded as ~1600-2500Hz where out
ears are most sensitive and the octave above.  Quite a few mics have
a "lift" in the upper range like this,.. especially omni's. Rob D.





--
Rob Danielson
Peck School of the Arts
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
http://www.uwm.edu/~type/audio-art-tech-gallery/

six, new media faculty positions:
http://www.uwm.edu/~type/FilmDept/Hirings/base.htm






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU