6. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science?

Subject:	6. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science?
From:	"Chris Owens" owensch2002
Date:	Fri Apr 13, 2007 7:16 am ((PDT))

I'm intrigued as well. I use one regularly, as do a few other members of th=
e
WSRS (Wildlife Sound Recording Society). There are users of the Telinga
systems as well as those who use an MS rig in reflector.

Chris.

-----Original Message-----
From: 
 On Behalf Of stoatwizard
Sent: 13 April 2007 13:17
To: 
Subject: [Nature Recordists] Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin
Science?

--- In  Klas Strandberg <>
wrote:

Hi, Klas

> And still, in England, there is a group of people who frenetically
> deny that stereo is at all possible in a dish.

I'm intrigued - who are these guys ;) As an English user of the Stereo
Datmic it still seems to work on my patch...

Richard

"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg
Yahoo! Groups Links

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
6. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science?, Chris Owens <= 6. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science?, Walter Knapp

Previous by Date:	5. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science?, Klas Strandberg
Next by Date:	7. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science?, Antonio Celis
Previous by Thread:	5. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science?, Klas Strandberg
Next by Thread:	6. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science?, Walter Knapp
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU