Subject: | Battery phantom power supply |
---|---|
From: | "maxfrick78" maxfrick78 |
Date: | Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:01 am ((PDT)) |
Hi group, I want to buy a battery 48V Phantom Power supply like the ART phantom II or= Rolls PB224. Rob Danielson often uses the Rolls in his tests, but the ART is also metion= ed. I browsed the posts on those but couldn't find any direct comparison. So my question woul= d be: Does anyone know of advantages of the ART over the Rolls or vice versa? I'm= thinking of weight, stability of power supply, current drain, quality of construction, = ease of use, noise level and so on. The price is less important to me since they are both rela= tively low-cost (so if there's any device three times the money but more reliable in some way that= 'd be interesting too..) greetings, Max |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: schoeps ms, thxdave |
---|---|
Next by Date: | WIRE NOISE, Michael Dalton |
Previous by Thread: | 3. Re: $1000 recorder challenge - edition 1, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | Re: Battery phantom power supply, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU