Subject: | Re: Battery phantom power supply |
---|---|
From: | "maxfrick78" maxfrick78 |
Date: | Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:01 am ((PDT)) |
> >ART phantom II or Rolls PB224. > > quality of construction, > > Rolls has the advantage in it its battery drawers Yeah, I saw the drawers on the Rolls, how does replacing the 2 9V batteries= in the ART work? Do you have to open the whole unit to do that? > Haven't tried Core Sound's unit that was just mentioned. Rob D. The 2Phant sounds like a great unit (apart from the strange noise-specs tha= t were discussed), the battery-state LED and the hotswapability + low weight sound= s good. I might have missed some posts, but did anyone really test this unit? They cl= aim a 'higher current drain' (2x10mA) but the Rolls PB224 specsheet also claims 20mA: http://www.directproaudio.com/images/products/pb224man.pdf Is there some more trickery involved? max |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: New open source DAW software, Volker Widmann |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Battery phantom power supply, John Hartog |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Battery phantom power supply, Curt Olson |
Next by Thread: | Re: Battery phantom power supply, John Hartog |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU