5. Re: why recording at 96kHz or more ? [it was ....Re: Noise related

["Steven Taylor" steev_x]

On 22 Mar 2007, at 13:53, Rob Danielson wrote:
> Hi Steven--
> Are there any comparative examples of this you
> can point us to? The difference in animal
> responses you and Gianna refer to are curious.
> I'd need to spend $2000 on a faster computer to
> mix four tracks at 96Khz but this is not stopping
> me from being curious. Rob D.

No, I have absolutely no idea why the cat would ignore digital sound
coming out of a speaker, the digital-ness may not have been the issue
of course... but this was a nervous cat, move your foot (while it was
facing the other way) and it would jump round to see what happened.
Yet it would sit on my lap whilst I was editing loud music or sound
effects and it wouldn't flinch. A friend's cat seems to have the same
tendency.

S