6. Re: why recording at 96kHz or more ? [it was ....Re: Noise rel

["Mark R." seoulgypsy]

>I don't understand that. By theory, low frequencies should not benefit
>from increasing the sample rate.

sample rate should further extend the definition should it not? as a
bass player for some twenty odd years, i have found that listening to
24/96 brings out movement and a sense of space that 16/44 just can't
come close to... it is like the difference between plywood and the
real thing for me. whether or not it is the 24 bit or the 96kps..i
just couldn't say, but i can certainly hear a difference

mark