4. why recording at 96kHz or more ? [it was ....Re: Noise rel

["Raimund Specht" animalsounds]

Steve, you wrote:

> Those are good points Gianni. As a post production person I would
> certainly like to see more people recording in 24/96, it makes a
> massive difference when mixing multiple tracks.

I would agree that 24 bit instead of 16 bit would make a difference,
but I'm not so sure about the sample rate...

> Often the discussion of the benefits of higher sampling rates focuses =

> on the high frequency spectrum, but it makes a real difference to the =

> low end too, comparing the lower registers of a Cello or Double Bass
> at 44 and 96 will leave you with little doubt.

I don't understand that. By theory, low frequencies should not benefit
from increasing the sample rate.

Raimund