naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

3. Re: why recording at 96kHz or more ? [it was ....Re: Noise related

Subject: 3. Re: why recording at 96kHz or more ? [it was ....Re: Noise related
From: "Lou Judson" inaudio
Date: Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:12 am ((PDT))
My cats never di either - until I played Kakadu Billabong by (oh darn
memory) the australian fella. My cat for the first time walked up to
and tried walking around and into the speakers ro find some of those
critters. Not everything digital does that, but that CD did big time!
Never listened to music or Lps, just nature CDs.

<L>
On Mar 22, 2007, at 6:53 AM, Rob Danielson wrote:

>
>>
>>  I used to notice when I had a cat  around the
>> house that he just wouldn't react to the
>> disembodied  sounds coming out of my speakers,
>> yet would jump at the smallest
>> 'real' sound.
>





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • 3. Re: why recording at 96kHz or more ? [it was ....Re: Noise related, Lou Judson <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU