Subject: | Re: My personal choice |
---|---|
From: | "Raimund Specht" animalsounds |
Date: | Tue Jan 9, 2007 1:57 am ((PST)) |
Klas Strandberg wrote: > MicroTrack 24/96 has a much better mic preamp than the Edirol, (as > good as the HiMD???) Yes, I agree. SONY's HiMD recorders seem to be even better than the MicroTrack in this regard. I just started to measure the unweighted equivalent input noise levels of various recorders: M-Audio MicroTrack 24/96: -113 dBu Edirol R-09: -106 dBu SONY DAT Walkman TCD-D3 (15 years old): -115 dBu home-made INA163-based preamplifier: -128 dBu John reported for his SONY HiMD recorder a noise level of -122 dBu. I will add the TASCAM HD-P2 and Marantz PMD 6xx recorders to the comparison table at http://www.avisoft.com/recordertests.htm within the next few weeks. Regards, Raimund |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: USB battery (was: My personal choice), oryoki2000 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | "A whining sound", Klas Strandberg |
Previous by Thread: | Re: My personal choice, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | Re: My personal choice, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU