| Subject: | Re: Comparison Tests - My own Attempts |
|---|---|
| From: | "Rob Danielson" danielson_rob |
| Date: | Fri Dec 22, 2006 12:20 am ((PST)) |
At 11:48 PM +0000 12/21/06, tk7859 wrote: re: > in the following order:- single Rapid, single Panasonic, Old Rapid >35-0190 triplet, new Rapid 35-0192 triplet, Rode NT4. [playback >volume matched:] > >m("btinternet.com/adjusted_compilationmp3.mp3","//uk.geocities.com/g0sbw");">http: Hi Tom-- Do you have a theory for the difference between the 35-0190's and 35-0192's as they're just supposed to have a different mount? I hope the 35-0190's retain the same quality. We just received 300! Rob D. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Comparison Tests - My own Attempts, tk7859 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Comparison Tests - My own Attempts, tk7859 |
| Previous by Thread: | Comparison Tests - My own Attempts, tk7859 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Comparison Tests - My own Attempts, tk7859 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU