well if you include the 4 channel to 2 channel encoding there are two
types of encoding then. one is the 4 to 2 encoding which seems
straightforward. the other seems like it could be more problematic.
that is the natural tetrahedral 4 channels [w,x,y,x channels] that
are turned into mono, stereo, 5.1, 7.1 etc...through the software.
this is less clear to me that it can be true to life in all
respects. not saying it isnt accurate, just that i am not clear on
it yet. i am reading the ambisonics papers.
Danny
--- In "Aaron Ximm"
<> wrote:
>
> On 12/19/06, Danny Meltzer <> wrote:
> > http://www.core-sound.com/TetraMic/1.php
> >
> > anyone used or heard about this? seems neat. any thoughts as to
> > whether having to put everything through the software to decode it
> > will affect cueing accuracy?
>
> Been waiting to see when it ships!
>
> I'm hoping it could be a nice absolutely-small surround sound
solution
> like the HEBs.
>
> The theory of coding all four tracks into two 192k outputs is really
> nice (if it works), if I could that working on my 722 it's a
> no-brainer... :)
>
> aaron
>
> --
>
> quietamerican.org
> oneminutevacation.org
>
> 83% happy
> 9% disgusted
> 6% fearful
> 2% angry
>
|