naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MKH20/AT3032 comparisons

Subject: Re: MKH20/AT3032 comparisons
From: "Rob Danielson" danielson_rob
Date: Mon Sep 4, 2006 1:18 pm (PDT)
At 11:30 AM -0500 9/4/06, Curt Olson wrote:
>Walt Knapp wrote:
>
>>  Posted by: "Rob Danielson"
>>
>>>  It seems the boundary aspect of Curt's rig is quite a bit closer to
>>>  the SASS than the Jecklin. His wood extends infron providing
>>>  attenuation though different Hz affect than the foam baffle. The SASS
>>>  mics are at a wider angle but both designs are fairly front-facing.
>>
>>  When I first looked at Curt's experiments it did look like he was
>>  reinventing the SASS. Some of his other experiments duplicate other
>>  boundary mic experiments.
>
>Call my rigs anything you want. Here's the background:
>
>I used Crown PZMs extensively during my years working in music and live
>concert production. Crown's literature on boundary mics is full of
>interesting ideas, and I tried a number of them back then in addition
>to most of the other standard micing techniques, using a fairly wide
>range of both high-end and modest mics. I developed a reasonable
>working knowledge, but my level of real understanding was not very
>deep. (I suspect this is often the case in pro audio, though few will
>admit it.)
>
>Thankfully over the last couple years I've been able to slow down
>enough to do some serious "tinkering in the garage" with various stereo
>mic rigs in order to better understand what really happens with this or
>that type of array. And of course it's all been based on concepts that
>have been out there for decades. There are only so many ways to make
>stereo. It shouldn't surprise anyone that similar ideas turn up again
>and again in one form or another. I figure that truly original
>"breakthrough" thoughts are extremely rare, and I certainly haven't had
>any on this subject. But I think I understand much better what I'm
>hearing and doing now than I did a few years ago.
>
>Curt Olson
>

Hi Curt--
To me, the "simplification" you have achieved is very elegant, if not
an invention.  Anyone can build a rig like your's and start exploring
boundary effects for almost no cost. But there's a lot more going on
with your rig than "copying." One of the things I hope to learn this
Fall when we study the rigs in the field recording class is how
corner capsule location affects phase cancellation.  Without your
rigs, we'd have no other approach to compare with Crown's. Rob D.








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU