| Subject: | Dynamic EQ |
|---|---|
| From: | "John Hartog" hartogj |
| Date: | Tue Aug 1, 2006 7:53 am (PDT) |
Any reason why using a Dynamic EQ for filtering hiss in a nature recording is a bad idea? In the linked image you can see how I curved the Low Pass to conform to passing rain. What I'm trying to do is reduce hiss in the rainless portions while preserving the subtle higher frequency sounds of fine rain across a lake. http://www.rockscallop.org/test/dyn-eq.jpg John Hartog |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Oops, I meant Shure WL-183, antonio celis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Dynamic EQ, Rob Danielson |
| Previous by Thread: | Oops, I meant Shure WL-183, David K=FCrland |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Dynamic EQ, Rob Danielson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU
