Subject: | Re: Edirol R-09 or MAudio Microtrack? |
---|---|
From: | "beppopatina" beppopatina |
Date: | Fri Jun 23, 2006 11:23 am (PDT) |
--- In Dale Hoffman <> wrote: > > Hello Recordists, > > I've been reading with interest the comments on Edirol's new R-09 and > wonder if anyone had practical comparisons to make between it and > MAudio's Microtrack 24/96. One big physical difference I have noticed > is that the Edirol uses store bought batteries, while the > Microtrack's batteries can't be removed. Over at taperssection.com the R-09 and microtrack are being discussed at le= ngth. The microtrack does not have many fans there for various reasons: noisy preamps= , noisy line in, software glitches, and in one instance an exploding battery! the r-09 is very new, so there is less info about use in the field, but pre= liminary reports are promising. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Edirol R-09 or MAudio Microtrack?, Dale Hoffman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Edirol R-09 or MAudio Microtrack?, Aaron Ximm |
Previous by Thread: | Edirol R-09 or MAudio Microtrack?, Dale Hoffman |
Next by Thread: | Re: Edirol R-09 or MAudio Microtrack?, Aaron Ximm |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU