naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Edirol R-09 or MAudio Microtrack?

Subject: Edirol R-09 or MAudio Microtrack?
From: "Dale Hoffman" dale40203
Date: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:30 am (PDT)
Hello Recordists,

I've been reading with interest the comments on Edirol's new R-09 and
wonder if anyone had practical comparisons to make between it and
MAudio's Microtrack 24/96. One big physical difference I have noticed
is that the Edirol uses store bought batteries, while the
Microtrack's batteries can't be removed.

This will be my first recorder of any substance which will be used
for speech and environmental (nature/urban) work.

I'd like to share a URL to a site which I learned about through and
interview I heard on NPR.
The site http://www.transom.org has lots of forum and editorial space
including this review of the MAudio 24/96:

http://www.transom.org/tools/recording_interviewing/200512.maudio_microtrac=
k.html

I enjoy this list very much and have learned much since joining.

Thanks!
Dale Hoffman
Louisville, KY




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU