Subject: | Edirol R-09 or MAudio Microtrack? |
---|---|
From: | "Dale Hoffman" dale40203 |
Date: | Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:30 am (PDT) |
Hello Recordists, I've been reading with interest the comments on Edirol's new R-09 and wonder if anyone had practical comparisons to make between it and MAudio's Microtrack 24/96. One big physical difference I have noticed is that the Edirol uses store bought batteries, while the Microtrack's batteries can't be removed. This will be my first recorder of any substance which will be used for speech and environmental (nature/urban) work. I'd like to share a URL to a site which I learned about through and interview I heard on NPR. The site http://www.transom.org has lots of forum and editorial space including this review of the MAudio 24/96: http://www.transom.org/tools/recording_interviewing/200512.maudio_microtrac= k.html I enjoy this list very much and have learned much since joining. Thanks! Dale Hoffman Louisville, KY |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: R-09, anyone?, Greg Peterson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Edirol R-09 or MAudio Microtrack?, beppopatina |
Previous by Thread: | Re: R-09, anyone?, Greg Peterson |
Next by Thread: | Re: Edirol R-09 or MAudio Microtrack?, beppopatina |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU