naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Relective properties for DIY projects

Subject: Re: Relective properties for DIY projects
From: "Rich Peet"
Date: Sun May 21, 2006 8:11pm(PDT)
In my next version of the cube I will try very dense absorbtive foam
and not use wood.  The gain of the boundary does not seem to be true
hemispherical. I have read reports on both sides of this.  But I
figure if I keep using the very quiet mics types I really don't need
the boundary gain from what I am seeing in the field. I am just not
finding my mics with there high outputs can be driven to +60db on the
preamp.  I would say the mics have too high of a noise but they are
out performing my ears so I can not complain.

Rich

--- In  "John Hartog"
<> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
> It's important here to distinguish boundary from other barrier
techniques.
> For boundary mics the direct and reflected sounds that combine at the
> reflective surface give several dB of wanted free gain.  For other
> barrier techniques, like a Jecklin Disk, an absorptive surface is
> ideal to reduce unwanted phase cancellation between direct to the mic
> and reflected off the barrier sounds.
>
> -John Hartog
>
>
>
> --- In  Secomb's <secowlet@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all
> > There have been a variety of DIY projects that have been floating
> > around. Which material that is used is essential component of any
such
> > project. I have been under the assumption that harder and smoother
the
> > material, the greater the sound would be reflected.  To me  Rich
making
> > a cube array  with wood made sense but a softer material  such as
high
> > density foam  will result in less sound reflected  towards the mic.
>  The
> > concept of  emphasising a particular range of frequency is
interesting.
> > A little while ago, a mouse pad was used as a Jenklin disk (I think).
> > Again a softer material with a slight texture will give less dB when
> > compared to wood for instance .
> > With those more experienced in sound recording is there a rule of
thump
> > what are the reflective properties of a variety of  material that is
> > used in DIY projects. It appears not only the degree of sound that is
> > reflected to consider, the tonal quality is also important.
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.6.1/344 - Release Date:
19/05/06
> >
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU