naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Strange results with mkh 20? - Problem solved

Subject: Re: Strange results with mkh 20? - Problem solved
From: "Rich Peet" <>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 14:09:26 -0000
We will see what Romily reports back but the MKH series does pull more
phantom current than most any other mic.  Likely the R4 could not
supply the current needed.

Rich

--- In  "Julian Baldwin"
<> wrote:
>
> Romily,
> Could you please let us know what the cause of the problem was with your
> Edirol R4 / MKH 20 setup? It would be very useful to the rest of us
to be
> able avoid such odd problems in the future. Without being familiar
with the
> R4 it is difficult to imagine what incorrect setting of the R4 could be
> responsible for the mics sounding to be incorrectly placed.
> Incidentally, I think your original idea of using MKH 40s for your
(singing)
> recording was probably the correct one rather than MKH 20s which do
not seem
> to me to be the appropriate mic for the job. You might also try a
test with
> the Rode NT4 as this might solve your problem for rather less money
than the
> MKHs.
> 
> Julian
> Bristol, England
> 







________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU