| Subject: | RE: MKH418S vs MKH30 + 60 |
|---|---|
| From: | "Brian Dasilva" <> |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Mar 2006 19:10:18 -0700 |
Mini Me??? -----Original Message----- From: On Behalf Of tm957904 Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 7:08 PM To: Subject: [Nature Recordists] MKH418S vs MKH30 + 60 >From what I gather, the MKH30 and 60 make a highly suitable m/s set up for ambient recording. However, I see Sennheiser do an all in one model, then MKH418S. As well as being less to carry, this should also get around the issue of wind protection. Question is, how does it perform in comparision? Anyone given this fella a test run against the 30 and 60 (or 50)? Thanks again! Steve Jones "Microphones are not ears, Loudspeakers are not birds, A listening room is not nature." Klas Strandberg Yahoo! Groups Links ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | MKH418S vs MKH30 + 60, tm957904 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Outboard A/D Conversion, Aaron Ximm |
| Previous by Thread: | MKH418S vs MKH30 + 60, tm957904 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MKH418S vs MKH30 + 60, Aaron Ximm |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU