Subject: | Re: Re: Locating gunshots by sound |
---|---|
From: | Steve Pelikan <> |
Date: | Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:14:28 -0500 |
All: Yes! I second Spiesberger '05 as worthy of study. The only setting I've been successful in doing automated locating of biological interest has been with Song Sparrows and Indigo Buntings in the middle of a big field: no echo from vegetation, birds and microphones all near ground etc. Rich might get lucky in that gunshots are so distict and loud that he might be able to identify/align them in different signals even after they've passed through a forest. I can't wait to learn whether it works. SP ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Locating gunshots by sound, werainey |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: New Publication, Jeffrey D. Daub |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Locating gunshots by sound, werainey |
Next by Thread: | Re: Locating gunshots by sound, Rich Peet |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU