Subject: | dynamic mic |
---|---|
From: | "oryoki2000" <> |
Date: | Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:43:56 -0000 |
I'm working on a project that will place a recorder, unattended, outside for several weeks at a time. We're trying to control battery power requirements, and the topic of using a dynamic mic has come up. My admittedly limited understanding is that dynamics are not the first choice for nature recording because of they are not as sensitive as condenser mics, and have a higher noise floor. However, dynamics are durable, highly resistant to humidity, and less expensive. And they don't require battery power. Can anyone recommend a dynamic mic for nature recording? Or are the benefits of condenser mics worth the extra kilograms of battery weight? --oryoki ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: HiMD v C Flash, streakyskies |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Sony MZ-RH10, RamsayThom |
Previous by Thread: | Hirose connector on the 722, Gianni Pavan |
Next by Thread: | Re: dynamic mic, Marty Michener |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU