naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Adobe Audition 2.0

Subject: Adobe Audition 2.0
From: "Martyn Stewart" <>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:59:54 -0800
I have to admit that the new Audition 2 is a million times more advanced
than 1.5. I have beta tested it for over a month and I will not go back to
1.5.
Before I was working with 5.1 or multi channels from my SD744,
I had to transfer files into Cubasis because Adobe Audition would split
files into 4 and not allow separation within the program.
There are many changes to the interface and it adds up to a more streamline
professional looking and feeling program.
Agreed, not much for just stereo recordists.
But one of the many additions to the program is a very smart lasso selectio=
n
tool, very cool for filtering out from within spectral view, not unlike
Raven 1.5


Martyn

****************************************

Martyn Stewart

Bird and Animal Sounds Digitally Recorded at:
http://www.naturesound.org
Redmond. Washington. USA
N47.65543 W121.98428

e-mail: 
Tel: 425-898-0462

Make every Garden a wildlife Habitat!

*****************************************


-----Original Message-----
From: 
 On Behalf Of Rich Peet
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 7:14 AM
To: 
Subject: [Nature Recordists] Re: Caution! Tech Talk

Adobe Audition released version 2.0 this week.
The only thing addressed by this version of any benefit are for the
people recording many tracks, or high data rates, or need very low
latency.  Not a needed upgrade for stereo recordists at normal rates.

They gave a better engine to the program and now support ASIO drivers
which also are the driver of choice for many multitrack 24/96 recordists.

Recording with a dsp that has a 0 cpu load and using an external drive
for data also helps a lot.  I was able to record with my setup at 4
track 24/96 using a 233 mhz "junk" laptop but not with Audition version 1.

Rich

--- In  "Mark R." <> wrote:
....

> inadequacies of not having enough speed and or memory. This is a big
concern
> for me as I absolutely hate not having enough processing power and or
> storage to work through projects comfortably.
>
> So my question is,  what are your strategies for overcoming the
processing
> speed / RAM etc.. to make things run smoothly for high bit rate
recording,
> with a starting point at say 24/96.
>
> Best,
>
> Mark Ragsdale
>
>
>
> www.moonbridges.com
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg
Yahoo! Groups Links











________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Adobe Audition 2.0, Martyn Stewart <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU