Subject: | Back to the EM-158 |
---|---|
From: | Klas Strandberg <> |
Date: | Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:04:22 +0100 |
I am sorry folks, but the promising EM 158 doesn't do what it says it does.= Again, it seems to be some mix up between "mV/Pa, self-noise" and "sensitivity". Looking at the Primo data sheet, one can easily get the impression that EM158 should have a lower self noise than other mic's of the same size. But= it hasn't. It gives more mV/Pa than similar ones, but the self noise follows the same increase of gain. I hate this word "sensitivity". It is used in so many different ways that one can never trust it. Sensitivity shall be expressed as mV/Pa. Self noise as db(A) Period. Klas.=20 ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Powering Small Electrets was low voltage DC phantom, Klas Strandberg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: low voltage DC phantom (was new firmware for M-Audio Microtra=, umashankar |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Powering Small Electrets was low voltage DC phantom, Mark R. |
Next by Thread: | Re: low voltage DC phantom (was new firmware for M-Audio Microtra=, umashankar |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU