naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mic input noise of M-Audio MicroTrack 24/96

Subject: Re: mic input noise of M-Audio MicroTrack 24/96
From: Klas Strandberg <>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 23:45:02 +0100
For the unlucky buyers of MicroTrack's, with terrible shame, hiding in the=

mud, - I have some comfort:

Both EM23 and EM21 (in phantom powered versions) work beautifully with the=

MicroTrack.
Just very simple mic's. Can't be that impossible to find other mic's which=

also work fine.

Comfort, - if you can overlook with the insanity of making a recorder which=

has no stand-by monitoring, that is.
Having monitoring only when recording - which difference does it make for
such a recorder's current consumption? Just a single headphone amp vs. the=

entire recording circuit?
Does anyone have a good guess?

Klas.



  At 07:49 2005-11-01, you wrote:
> >I was just looking at the 'tapers' site and they seem to have
> >enjoyed your evaluation too. In fact someone wanted to pass it on to
> >M-Audio. Maybe your tests will have an impact for nature recordist's
> >needs as well.
> >Thanks Dan!
>
>I copied it to M-Audio myself.
>
>-Dan Dugan
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
email: 
        



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU