| Subject: | Re: RFI M-Audio Micro Track 24/96 |
|---|---|
| From: | Lou Judson <> |
| Date: | Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:12:26 -0700 |
If that is the S/N ratio, -129 is very good and -125 not so good. -100 is terrible! That's 30 dB more noise than an ancient Shure M267 mixer... Lou Judson =95 Intuitive Audio 415-883-2689 On Oct 10, 2005, at 9:21 PM, Rob Danielson wrote: > -100dB seems impressive, but assuming -7dB for headroom, the MT TRS > pre input stands to introduce more noise than some of the quieter > mics nature recordists use ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PMD 660 Dilemma. test recordings, Rob Danielson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Comparing noise, Lou Judson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFI M-Audio Micro Track 24/96, Rob Danielson |
| Next by Thread: | PMD 660 Dilemma. test recordings, Rafael Marquez |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU