Re: Sound Devices 722 VS. HHB PORTADISC

naturerecordists

Re: Sound Devices 722 VS. HHB PORTADISC

Subject:	Re: Sound Devices 722 VS. HHB PORTADISC
From:
Date:	Sun, 18 Sep 2005 18:07:14 EDT


In a message dated 9/16/2005 8:10:49 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,=20
 writes:

Save you  money and step up to the sound devices 722 if you can. There is
nothing I  can say to discredit the machine.


Dear  All,

So is this a superior machine to the HHB Portadisc for nature  recording?

Thanks for the information.

John


John V. Moore  Nature Recordings


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Sound Devices 722 VS. HHB PORTADISC, JVMNATREC <=

Previous by Date:	RE: Sound Devices 722 battery life, Anton Woldhek
Next by Date:	comparing Portadisc and 722, oryoki2000
Previous by Thread:	Re: NT-4 mod update, Rob Danielson
Next by Thread:	comparing Portadisc and 722, oryoki2000
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU