Subject: | Re: I bought an Edirol R-1. Best, worst features? Quiet back east. |
---|---|
From: | Lou Judson <> |
Date: | Tue, 6 Sep 2005 16:27:38 -0700 |
Sorry to be a niggler, but the proper term here is "noisy," not "loud." Loud could mean they have too much gain, when what you mean is they have too much hiss and noise - am I correct? Too much gain would not be a bad thing as long as you can turn it down, but too much noise would be a Very Bad Thing! Please do not take this wrong, I am just trying to clarify. Lou On Sep 6, 2005, at 4:13 PM, Martyn Stewart wrote: > All I have heard about this device Rip is that the pre-amps are a > little too > loud! People that have bought the machine are basically happy with it > as a > hand-held unit. Others that have gone to a similar machine have bought > the > PMD-660 but again, the pre-amps in that machine are also a little too > loud. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Spectragrams, was pink noise WAS historical recordings, Martyn Stewart |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: draft procedure for amateur recording in parks, v. 2, Rich Peet |
Previous by Thread: | Re: I bought an Edirol R-1. Best, worst features? Quiet back east., Lou Judson |
Next by Thread: | RE: I bought an Edirol R-1. Best, worst features? Quiet back east., Martyn Stewart |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU