naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Mic attenuation on purpose (was Min mV/Pa 4 MD..

Subject: RE: Mic attenuation on purpose (was Min mV/Pa 4 MD..
From: "Martyn Stewart" <>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 11:37:08 -0700
I have had a few complaints from people that this list is becoming the mic
builders list, a few have unsubscribed until it gets back to what was
intended to be "Nature Recording"

Please keep ON subject....

Martyn

****************************************
Martyn Stewart
Bird and Animal Sounds Digitally Recorded at:
http://www.naturesound.org
Redmond. Washington. USA
N47.65543=A0=A0 W121.98428

e-mail: 
Tel:    425-898-0462

Make every Garden a wildlife Habitat!
*****************************************


-----Original Message-----
From: 
 On Behalf Of Rob Danielson
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 11:03 AM
To: 
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Mic attenuation on purpose (was Min mV/Pa =
4
MD..

Hi Mike-- Thanks for your thoughts. Methinks this is getting too
technical for the list. Let me know, off list, if its okay for me to
follow-up, off list. Rob D. <>

  =3D =3D =3D

At 12:33 PM -0500 9/3/05, Mike Feldman wrote:
>Rob Danielson wrote:
>
>>... I'm looking into the
>>  nature of small circuit built into the unbalanced, 3.5mm cable that
>>  Rode provides with the NT-4. I've by-passed the circuit in my NT-4
>>  cable and mic output jumped up 12dB-- the same dB drop in output (and
>>  increase in noise)...
>>  I'm waiting to recommend the simple cable modification until I can
>>  figure out if there are bad consequences I've not grasped. Here's
>>  what I think** the circuit is should anyone have ideas:
>>  http://www.uwm.edu/~type/Mic%20Preamps/NT-4ConnectorCircuit&ModSm.jpg
>
>If I'm reading your drawing correctly, you're shorting the series
>resistor of the pad, but not opening the parallel resistor.  So there
>would still be some attenuation dependent on the input impedance of
>the sink.
>
>>  **umashankar mantravadi, who is on this list, has commented on the
>>  micbuilders list that my circuit drawing looks more like line to mic
>>  pad, which, I assume, would have much greater attentuation than
>>  -12dB. Maybe the four tiny components on the pcb are not simple 10K
>>  resistors, as labeled and measured? I dunno. I think I have the basic
>>  circuit structure right though. Rob D.
>
>Sure looks like an L-pad.  You mentioned earlier they're labeled EDI
>on the pcb ... "Electrostatic Discharge" current limiter perhaps?

--



"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg
Yahoo! Groups Links











________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU