naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sennheiser MKH question

Subject: Re: Sennheiser MKH question
From: "derek holzer" <>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 16:14:09 +0200 (CEST)
Hi Bernie,

and thanks for the feedback. I hoped you might have looked into this one
already! ;-)

I did notice a big difference in the noise specs of the 418, coupled with
the fact that it is a low impedence, unbalanced output (XLR 5). Guess I'll
save my pennies.

Any suggestions about the M/S monitoring situation? Of course I can do the
encoding in post-production, but for monitoring from an M/S setup to a
recorder without an M/S encoder, I guess I'll need something in the
middle. Do any of the decent preamps out there do this? Other suggestions
that anyone has tried?

derek

> Back in the spring/summer of 04, we tested the 418 and found it
> useful for radio/tv production but not for ambient
> soundscapes...particularly of the natural kind. Main problem was that
> it was way too noisy for some of the subtler detail extant in the
> natural world.
>
> Stick with the MKH 30 combined with a MKH 40, 50 or 60.
>
> Bernie Krause
>
>>Has anyone here had a chance to demo the Sennheiser MKH 418-s? It's a
>>stereo, mid-side hypercardiod/shotgun mike, and I'm wondering how
>>favorably it compares to an MKH 30/60 M/S combo.
>>
>>The benefits I see are that you have one mike instead of two (weight
>>reduction), with a built-in M/S encoder so you can go straight to preamp
>>or recorder. And it retails in Europe for EUR 1290, whereas the 30/60
>>combo will set you back EUR 1288 (MKH 30) + EUR 1379 (MKH 60) for new
>>ones, not including clips to connect them and an M/S encoder if you want
>>to properly monitor them.
>>
>>But I wonder why the 418-s is more "budget" and where the corners got
>> cut.
>>I see in the spec a 40-20000 Hz frequency response (less range than an
>> MKH
>>60?), and it isn't labelled "extremely low self-noise" the way the other
>>MKH ones are, so that could be a pinch point.
>>
>>Feedback on this one? I could have a chance to buy an MKH 60 for about
>>half retail, which makes me a bit more torn between the two options! ;-)
>>
>>derek
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"Microphones are not ears,
>>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>>A listening room is not nature."
>>Klas Strandberg
>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Wild Sanctuary
> P. O. Box 536
> Glen Ellen, CA 95442
> t. 707-996-6677
> f. 707-996-0280
> http://www.wildsanctuary.com
>
>
>
> "Microphones are not ears,
> Loudspeakers are not birds,
> A listening room is not nature."
> Klas Strandberg
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU