Subject: | Re: I have an Edirol R4 and now I'm looking for a portable p |
---|---|
From: | Rob Danielson <> |
Date: | Wed, 17 Aug 2005 23:37:05 -0500 |
If mic preamp components are inexpensive like Klas says, why wouldn't a more specialized manufacturer like Edirol put in a quiet pre? Such a critical part of a recorder. The Sharp MT-90's mic pre (I just tested it last night) is quite noticeably noisier than the newer Sony NH-900 HiMD recorder. Very difficult to know what's what these days with recorders. Rob D. = = = = At 11:53 AM -0700 8/17/05, Dan Dugan wrote: >Greg Weddig wrote, > >>I did not have time to try the internal preamps with my Schoeps, Dan >>Dugan may have had time to do listen to the preamps, any comments Dan? > >I didn't examine the R4 carefully, but I did compare the R1's preamps >to a Sharp MD recorder. They were close in noise level and spectrum. >I don't thing the R4 necessarily needs external preamps if you have >hot mics. > >-Dan Dugan > > ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Noiseless Aircraft, Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Pre-amps, Stuart Fairbairn |
Previous by Thread: | Re: I have an Edirol R4 and now I'm looking for a portable p, Dan Dugan |
Next by Thread: | Re: I have an Edirol R4 and now I'm looking for a portable p, robleshugodaniel |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU