| Subject: | Re: distance vs. strength |
|---|---|
| From: | |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Aug 2005 10:06:38 EDT |
Ah yes, I had to go back and refresh my memory of basic geometry formulas. Thanks to math.com: Volume of a sphere is 4/3 pi r cubed, but surface area of a sphere is 4 pi r squared. So I retract the suggestion of a cubed relationship for distance and strength. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Here's to recordists!, doctorvandermast |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 744T in stock, Dan Dugan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: distance vs. strength, Rich Peet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Distance vs. strength, Randolph S. Little |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU