I agree. Tricking an animal to respond to a recording is pointless
and, really, sort of depressing if its done in the name of welfare.
What is that one _can't_ learn about the local owl population by
running a HiMD recorder for several nights? If they aren't calling
in the middle of mating season, their calls are probably destined to
fade. You can also learn more about the stresses they are
encountering. Rob D.
=3D =3D =3D
At 8:37 AM -0700 6/27/05, Martyn Stewart wrote:
>I couldn't agree with you more but what can you do? In my welcoming letter=
I
>cautioned the use of playback but I feel most times this falls on deaf ear=
s.
>I get hundreds of requests for sounds each week from my website and I ask
>each and every one of them "what's it for?" I do not give out sounds for
>photographers and hunters, I do not believe in call back as a tool in this
>way.
>Trouble is, you and I are a small voice in the wind, thousands of gadgets
>are now available and birders generally only care about increasing their
>life lists to the detriment of the bird.
>I have thousands of bird sounds recorded all over the world and I have NEV=
ER
>used call back to attract them.
>What is the simple answer beside education?
>
>Martyn
>
>Martyn Stewart
>Bird and Animal Sounds Digitally Recorded at:
>http://www.naturesound.org
>
>N47.65543 W121.98428
>Redmond. Washington. USA
>Make every Garden a wildlife Habitat!
>
>425-898-0462
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:
> On Behalf Of Rich Peet
>Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 7:28 AM
>To:
>Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] recording owl vocalizations
>
>--- In "wahpenayo" <>
>wrote:
>
>> I am calling the owls in by imitating their calls. They are reacting
>> to me as an intruder in their territory, or as a nearby territorial
>> owl. It's part of an experiment I'm conducting to compare barred owl
>> responsiveness to barred owl calls vs. spotted owl calls. It's a
>> small slice of the huge research effort ongoing for spotted owls.
>>
>> I'm keeping track of how long it takes them to respond, what calls
>> they use, the duration of their response, etc. If I record it, I
>> don't have to madly try to write everything down.
>>
>
>Doesn't someone else here see a problem in using playback of an
>endangered species sound to a competitor species that has been
>identified causing a hybrid problem.
>
>These owls are already being over surveyed by too many groups with the
>use of playback and are already being over banded by the use of
>playback. Is there one oldgrowth area anywhere where these owls are
>being left alone? Can't get my support to teach more barred owls that
>the spotted owl calls are a usual sound. Can't get my support to ever
>use playback on an endangered species for the purpose of advocating
>continued clearcut of forrests. This sure looks like way to much of a
>risk of ending up with a pile more "Barred X Spotted" Owls.
>
>Rich
>
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
--
Rob Danielson
Film Department
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|