| Subject: | Re: 722 vs PMD 671 |
|---|---|
| From: | |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:19:32 +0200 (MEST) |
Hi Rob, I just looked again at the spectrograms of my test files. You are correct, the soft 4.8 kHz square wave signal with harmonics at 9.6 and 14.4 kHz that is present on all test sections must originate from a third source via RFI. It is perahps the wireless phone on my desk. So, it is definitely not the SD 722 as I initially suggested. Reagrds, Raimund -- Geschenkt: 3 Monate GMX ProMail gratis + 3 Ausgaben stern gratis ++ Jetzt anmelden & testen ++ http://www.gmx.net/de/go/promail ++ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 722 vs PMD 671, recordingbird |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Savannah Sparrow, recordingbird |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 722 vs PMD 671, recordingbird |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ANWR (now coordinates), Greg Weddig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU