| Subject: | Re: ANWR |
|---|---|
| From: | "Rich Peet" <> |
| Date: | Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:20:23 -0000 |
--- In Dan Dugan <> wrote: > Huh. A different reference point? They've moved Greenwich, or > something? How far off are you in the wrong system? > Far enough for it to be a real issue. The problem comes from the way you choose to cut up a round world into flat maps. There are just many ways to do that. Whatever system you decide to use just define it after the data you enter. I like "World 84" because I believe it will continue to grow into being the most used standard. But that is a WAG. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: 722 vs PMD670, Tim Nielsen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: 722 vs PMD670, Klas Strandberg |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: ANWR, M, J, & V Phinney |
| Next by Thread: | Re: wireless microphones, Catarina N Moreira (Student) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU