Subject: | Re: freq response and aliasing of Edirol FA-101 (and FR-2) at 192 = |
---|---|
From: | Dan Dugan <> |
Date: | Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:53:59 -0800 |
kHz Rudy Trubitt, you wrote, >Most A/D designs have a fixed frequency analog input filter before the >A/D. If the A/D must operate at frequencies as high as 192, then this >fixed filter must be set high. The consequence of this (at least >theoretically) is that recordings made at lower sampling frequencies >(for example 44.1 on a device capable of 192) will have more aliasing >than would be the case if the input analog filter was set lower, to a >value appropriate for a 44.1 recorder, rather than a 192 model. If they do have a fixed low-pass filter, they're doing it very wrong. A multi-rate A/D should change the filter as it changes the sample rate. -Dan Dugan ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Questions - Spaced Omni Pairs, Dan Dugan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Boundary Mics, Walter Knapp |
Previous by Thread: | Speaker, Fernando Gonz=E1lez Garc=EDa |
Next by Thread: | Re: freq response and aliasing of Edirol FA-101 (and FR-2) at 192 =, Rudy Trubitt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU