naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sound quality and editing part 2

Subject: Re: Sound quality and editing part 2
From: "Rich Peet" <>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 04:40:42 -0000
Not ruffled by you just tired and abrupt in my response.  My error in 
making the response.
I did one of those 2:30am to noon trips to record dawn this morning 
and at the end of those trips I am usually a bit wound up and run 
down.

And it was raining all morning, still.

Rich


--- In  Kent Shaw 
<> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>  
> As Mr Peet correctly pointed out there is no substitution for a 
knowledgeable and experienced recordist. And as an audio engineer 
inexperienced in the nuances and subtle details of birdcalls and 
nature sounds I would never assume I knew what was best without the 
input of the original recordist or someone experienced in the field. 
I do however stand behind my comments about a good quality soundcard 
and the importance of editing. I apologize if any feathers were 
ruffled.
>  
> Sincerely,
>  
> Kent Shaw
> 
> 
> 
>               
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Friends.  Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU