Assuming no problems,
all digital transfers should be identical of course, in terms of quality.
A bit is a bit (as long as there's no jitter or other problems).
Unless anyone has heard of one medium being more prone to problems?
FWIW it's much easier and cheaper to find coaxial SPDIF cables than long
optical ones, though maybe that's changed since aren't they used for
consumer 5.1 now?
best,
aaron
http://www.quietamerican.org
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
>From Tue Mar 8 18:27:15 2005
Message: 10
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 19:55:39 -0400
From: Lang Elliott <>
Subject: Re: Sample Rate Conversion
"Transfer" used in this context is not the same as "sample rate conversion".
You're talking about going from your recorder into your computer and
hopefully maintaining the sample rate of the original file. We're talking
about converting the sample rate after inputting the digital soundfile at
its normal sample rate.
Dear All,
So, is it safe to say that as long as one is transferring at real time these
sample rate conversions are not a big problem? I have transferred using
Sound
Blaster (shame on me?) and Llynx and have had no problem...BUT..I transfer
at
real Time.
Thanks,
John
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<=Unsubscribe>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|