Subject: | Re: more Sound Devices 722 |
---|---|
From: | Rob Danielson <> |
Date: | Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:08:44 -0500 |
At 12:35 AM +0200 4/12/04, Gianni Pavan wrote: >mmhhh, the spec say up to 96 kHz sampling anyway. I did not found any info >about 192 kHz sampling! > May be. I use 24/44.1K or 24/48K to save a bunch of storage space and I don't seem to lose anything that I can detect with my mics ->speakers. The noticeable jump is with 24 bit. Insect work might benfit, dunno. -- Rob Danielson Film Department University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: more Sound Devices 722, Kevin Colver |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Greatest Recordings, Wild Sanctuary |
Previous by Thread: | Re: more Sound Devices 722, Kevin Colver |
Next by Thread: | Re: more Sound Devices 722, Gianni Pavan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU