Subject: | Re: Head room and amplification after recording |
---|---|
From: | Dan Dugan <> |
Date: | Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:06:51 -0800 |
John V. Moore, you wrote, >I normalize to 90% when I am getting recordings ready for a >publication. This gives me a starting standard and makes most cuts >"listenable" without having to change the volume for each. Well, OK, but I don't recommend normalizing anything. Normalizing is based on peak level, which has little relationship to loudness. Loudness is what you want to balance, at least when mastering music. In the case of nature sounds, we want natural perspective. It doesn't make any sense to turn up quiet ambience recordings. They're supposed to be quiet. You wouldn't turn up the quiet movement of a symphony so it peaked to the same level as the finale! -Dan Dugan ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Coloration, Jim Morgan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Head room and amplification after recording, JVMNATREC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Head room and amplification after recording, JVMNATREC |
Next by Thread: | Re: Head room and amplification after recording, JVMNATREC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU