Thanks Klas,
I just now saw and listened your attached files you sent. The
second recording is a HUGE Difference in sound quality. What
Telinga Model was that in the second recording? Very nice!
I looked into the Big Ear thing, and it is just a little to
clumsy/heavy for me I think. I don't think the Teling's come with
headphones, I was wondering if you had any specific recommendations
there?
Thanks again.
John
--- In Klas Strandberg
<> wrote:
> If you focus on sports, go for the BIGEAR and a suitable
microphone. It is
> clumsy and heavy and no good for the nature recordist, but could
do well in
> your case.
>
> Small parabols like Gibson and Telinga will help, but not much.
Didn't I
> send a sound file to you, comparing the two? If not, please get in
touch and
> I'll do it. www.telinga.com
>
> The stereo DATmic is not the best for human sounds. Twin Science
is better.
>
> That Gibson "magnifies 75X" is stupid. I would never try to sell a
Telinga
> with such an argument.
>
> Klas /Telinga.
>
> At 16:00 2003-12-20 -0500, you wrote:
> >Hello to all, Great group of people here:)
> >
> >I am really interested in buying a new Parabolic Microphone, but
I don't
> know which one is best for the way I plan to use it.
> >
> >Which Parabola is best for picking up Human Voice Communication??
> >
> >I am learning that Parabola's are not cheap little toys, and
there is much
> more to them then meets the eye. That is why I have come here to
ask a few
> people with experience in the instruments for a few
recommendations before I
> shed out the cash. I am Not a handyman, so I don't want to build
anything.
> >
> >I really don't mind spending the money for a Quality Product, but
I would
> like to keep it under 1500 Dollars.
> >
> >I have narrowed down to few different Parabola Models, a Dan
Gibson P229,
> or P650, Telinga Pro Universal ME Series, or Telina Pro 5 Stereo
DAT.
> >
> >In the Dan Gibson advertisements, it states the Gibson increases
sound by
> 75x, but the Telinga's don't state at all how much they magnify
sound.
> >
> >I have searched the Internet, and various groups A LOT for the
past few
> days, but I cannot come up with the information I want to know.
> >
> >Which of the parabola's has the most potential to pick up faint
voice
> communication? I would really like to try and hear the little
conversations
> between pitchers and catchers, players in huddles, and just to
point the
> Microphone in all directions in my Neighborhood etc, etc. I also
wouldn't
> mind hearing crickets, and other insect, animal sounds during the
summer
> time either. If there is a Different Parabola Model I left out
the above,
> please feel free to make your recommendation as I will value it
greatly.
> >
> >Be as specific as you want when you describe the pro's and con's
of the
> different Parabolic Microphones. One more thing, I am Not really
into
> making recordings although I will Not count anything out.
> >
> >Thank you Kindly,
> >
> >John.
> >
> >
> >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
> >
> >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >
> >
> >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
> S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
> Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
> email:
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|