Subject: | Re: cordless headphones |
---|---|
From: | Dan Dugan <> |
Date: | Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:03:53 -0700 |
Rich Peet, you wrote, >Or maybe those infrared headphone units are more problem >free? The infrared units I have found so far are also 110 volt on >the receiver end. I think you mean the transmitter end, the headphones have a battery in them. I experimented with infrared stereo headphones some years ago when they first came out. They would fuzz out even near the transmitter if the receiver diode was shadowed. Definitely a short-range technology. I was able to get a clear stereo transmission over a hundred yards down the railroad tracks that were in back of my place. I used 6" theatrical fresnel lenses to focus the beam. Only suitable for a fixed installation, of course. -Dan Dugan ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: cordless headphones, Rich Peet |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Re: cordless headphones, Walter Knapp |
Previous by Thread: | Re: cordless headphones, Rich Peet |
Next by Thread: | Re: Re: cordless headphones, Walter Knapp |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU