No, I don't think it's too narrow a field. A MKH60 will give you a
different sonic impression than a MKH 40 or 50. Some even like to use
an omni (MKH20) with the Figure 8. It all depends on what sound is
pleasing and/or accurate to your ear and considering the flexibility
of your desired end result. That's why some prefer binaural (and its
technical relatives), mono (w/ parabolic dishes and shotgun mics),
and others XY stereo. Whatever system creates the best illusion for
you both in the field and finally, in the mix, is what works. There
is no right or wrong, here. Only what you like to hear.
Bernie
>Bernie said:
>
>> Sorry you missed the MKH30. That seems like a
>>> price that is too good to be true for a really decent mic. But you'd
>>> actually need to combine it with a MKH40 or 50 in order to make up a
>>> fine MS system.
>
>Bernie,
>Do you feel that the MKH60 is too narrow for an M/S system? It seems to ha=
ve
>worked well for Walt in his M/S rig.
>
>Dave
>(delurking ever so briefly)
>www.morrisonphotographics.com
>
>
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
--
Wild Sanctuary
P. O. Box 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677
707-996-0280 (FAX)
http://www.wildsanctuary.com
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|