naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Re: MD v. DAT

from [Dan Dugan] [Permanent Link][Original]
Subject: Re: Re: MD v. DAT
From: Dan Dugan <>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 10:54:54 -0700 
Walt, you wrote,

>I do like to get my info from others than just people selling their own
>recorder and software, as Raimund is.

Lighten up, Walt. Ad hominem arguments are rarely helpful to a
discussion. The virtues and vices of perceptual coding are pertinent
to this list, but let's keep it evidence-based.

-Dan Dugan


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Re: MD v. DAT/bit resolution, Jim Morgan
Next by Date:  Re: Re: MD v. DAT, Jeremy Minns
Previous by Thread:  Re: MD v. DAT, Rich Peet
Next by Thread:  Re: Re: MD v. DAT, Jeremy Minns
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU