naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Help with the unknown

Subject: RE: Help with the unknown
From: Gregory Kunkel <>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 11:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
Marty:
Well now I remained confused (not unusual). I guess
this CD will be burned with the song labeled
"unknown".

Greg Kunkel

--- Marty Michener <> wrote:
> Greg:
>
> At 09:40 AM 7/1/2003 -0700, you wrote:
> >Thanks Martyn and Doug
> >
> >Checking again with Borror's sonagrams I can see
> you
> >are right about the Blackburnian.
>
> Well EnjoyBirds Blackburnian is MUCH higher pitched
> - 6 - 9 kHz, not 3 - 5
> as in your sample.  I am not sure about how
> diagnostic pitch is.  The
> "Warbler Guide" by Dunn and Garrett, (without a
> single reference to actual
> pitch, actual time or to any spectrogram, and hence
> almost useless in song
> diagnosis), but says the species is often "too high
> pitched for many
> birders to hear" - a statement usually reserved for
> well above 6 kHz, where
> this mystery species has NO energy.
>
> I do agree that 1, 2 and 4 are likely the same
> species, but I have
> recordings of a Yellow-rump doing a similar
> high-slurred ending (which I
> recorded on three successive days in Massachusetts,
> failing to see it and
> believing it to be a Blackburnian, but finally
> seeing it on the last day
> and visually it was a completely typical eastern
> Yellow-rump). They are
> usually in about this right range, and of extremely
> variable timing.   So,
> I would give the probability for Dendroica fuscus
> less than 80% because of
> this atypical voice range.
>
> Now if you were to consider a Cerulean I might agree
> with you.  Much lower
> and in the right pitch range, the usual Cerulean
> song simply rises at the
> end in a "zhreee?", and so this pattern in these
> three examples is
> certainly atypical, but the pitch range is more
> nearly correct.  Certainly
> the Cerulean is declining in numbers but still
> likely abundant in the
> Catskills.  So that's my vote, I guess.  I do
> overall agree with Greg the
> song, like such a high percentage of warbler
> recordings, is problematic.
>
> >The AMRO threw me because of the flute-like phrases
> that I had not heard
> >before.
>
> that may be from all the mountain air  ;^)
>
> >        Greg Kunkel
>
> my best regards,
>
> Marty Michener
> MIST Software Associates PO Box 269, Hollis, NH
> 03049
>
> EnjoyBirds.com  - Software that migrates with you.=20
>  http://www.EnjoyBirds.com
>
>   ----------
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system
> (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.483 / Virus Database: 279 - Release
> Date: 5/19/2003
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
>


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU