Subject: | Re: Shotgun microphone |
---|---|
From: | Walter Knapp <> |
Date: | Fri, 04 Apr 2003 00:16:34 -0500 |
Martyn Stewart wrote: > (Note that a lot of the bit about parabolics not reflecting low > frequencies is flawed understanding of how sound travels through air. > Even the tiniest dish (or microphone diaphragm) reflects low > frequencies. If this were not so, then microphones could not pick up > those frequencies.) >=20 > I agree, I get better response from my Telinga dish to low frequencies > than I do from my shotguns >=20 > Some Notes from the British Library and a recording of a Roughed Grouse > I recorded. > http://www.naturesound.org/Examples.htm >=20 > Martyn Stewart For those wondering just what frequencies were recorded here's a sonogram of the first call: http://frogrecordist.home.mindspring.com/naturerecordists/Martyn.grouse.jpg Martyn, any idea what distance to the grouse? Walt ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Shotgun microphone, Martyn Stewart |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Shotgun microphone, Martyn Stewart |
Previous by Thread: | RE: Shotgun microphone, Martyn Stewart |
Next by Thread: | RE: Shotgun microphone, Martyn Stewart |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU