Subject: | Re: Sound editing & sonogram software on PC |
---|---|
From: | Dan Dugan <> |
Date: | Sat, 15 Mar 2003 19:50:52 -0800 |
Syd Curtis wrote: >A lot of attention is being given in recent postings to the frequency scal= e >of sonagrams. What about the relation between the time scale and the >frequency scale? > >Imagine a note which is a glissando slide up in pitch. Shorten the time >scale relative to the frequency and it approaches a vertical stroke on a >sonagram. Lengthen it enough and the trace approaches horizontal. > >Anyone like to comment on the approaches adopted by various sonagram-type >programs? I use Spectrafoo, and the time scale is the weakest part of its sonogram display. It just runs as fast as it can (limited by processing power), you have no control over the "writing" rate. The sonogram runs more slowly when other instruments are active. -Dan Dugan ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | re Portadisc battery caddy, oryoki2000 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: re Portadisc battery caddy, Dudley Edmondson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Sound editing & sonogram software on PC, Jeremy Minns |
Next by Thread: | Re: Sound editing & sonogram software on PC, Walter Knapp |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU