| Subject: | Re: Sennheiser me 67 sensitivity |
|---|---|
| From: | Walter Knapp <> |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Jan 2003 17:10:40 -0500 |
Phil Schr=F6ter wrote: > HI Walt, > > It seems to be something between the capture and the k6 - but isn't a su= ch > high sensivity ok for such a mic? This is a different thing from sensitivity. This is handling noise, and of a kind that should not occur. You have something that's loose in the mic that should not be. I don't use the ME's, but MKH's. They are just as sensitive, but can be waved around pretty violently without such noise. Walt ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Camp - Neat Idea, Rich Peet <richpeet@attbi.com> |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Stumped on a mic despite researching, zplazm <myrmika@aol.com> |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Sennheiser me 67 sensitivity, Phil Schr=F6ter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Sennheiser me 67 sensitivity, Vicki Powys |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU