naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Quality of CD's

Subject: Re: Quality of CD's
From:
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:12:44 EST
In a message dated 11/24/2002 10:48:09 PM Central Standard Time, 
 writes:


>  wrote:
> > Hey Everyone
> > Not sure if this was covered in the last discussion of how long CD's will 
> 
> > last or their over all quality. Here is an interesting article on quality 
> of 
> > CD's. Not sure if it is based in any fact though. 
> > http://www.cdmediaworld.com/hardware/cdrom/cd_quality.shtml
> > 
> > I don't know about you, but I was confused about the quality of CD's. 
> 
> When I compare test against test from various sources it gets even more 
> unclear. Not a lot of agreement.
> 
> One brand I've never had fail (fuji) gets bad marks. Another that I lost 
> quite a few unrecorded blanks due to coating deterioration (sony) gets 
> good marks. On the sony ones, those that I recorded on have not 
> deteriorated, only the ones not used. Figure that one. Once I've burned 
> a CD-R I've yet to have one fail.
> 
> I still use both brands. I also use 80 minute CD-R, which, more and more 
> are all I find around. And they called those illegal.
> 
> I'm pretty sure there are some poorly made CD-R's. Or probably more 
> correctly some poorly made batches of CD-R's. The high popularity and 
> cheap price for the disk will make for lots of corner cutting.
> 
> I stick with brand names, and burn carefully. I don't use high speed 
> burning, normally either 4x or 6x. And make multiple copies.
> 
> The stuff I really want to protect is also on optical disks. CD-R are 
> sometimes called optical disks, but there are real archival quality 
> optical disks. They more closely resemble minidiscs in that they are in 
> a protective shell. And their ratings are much higher than CD-R. You 
> really want to protect it get a real optical drive.
> 
> The unfortunate thing is that optical disks cost more. So, in time the 
> cheapskate users will drive them off the market. Zip disks already did a 
> lot of damage. Then there will be no trustworthy archival disks. We are 
> about due for another big lesson, about like the lesson that was taught 
> when things put on computer tape were considered archival. By the time 
> they learned better a lot of data was gone.
> 
> Walt
> 
> 

I have used Imation CD-R, 80 Min / 700 MB for years and haven't had any 
troubles. Just my two cents.
Stan Tekiela
Author / Naturalist
Wildlife Photographer


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU