No. It was actually Cambridge or Oxford in the UK, Walt. I'll try to
trace it down for us when I get a moment.
BK
>Wild Sanctuary wrote:
>>
>> I got word back in March that there is a team of two fellas at Oxford
>> or Cambridge in the UK who have developed reasonable match-to-sample
>> software but have been unable to track them down. Anyone know who
>> that might be?
>
>Well, it's from Australia, and it was about frogcall ID, but does this
>sound like it?
>
>http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~andrewt/papers/frog_iaai96/frog_iaai96.html
>
>This is the most hopeful thing I've seen, I've been meaning to follow up
>on it and see how it would do on Georgia's frogs. With today's faster
>computers it might be pretty good as it could make finer discriminations.
>
> I saw a report by someone who had used the system to evaluate if ATRAC
>was going to mess it up. No problem with ATRAC recorded material, I'd
>have been surprised if there was. It did sound like this was having a
>fairly high success rate ID'ing between a choice of 22 frogs. It has to
>be trained to the calls you want it to work with so it's probably going
>to be something that would have to be trained to a local population.
>
>Walt
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
--
Wild Sanctuary, Inc.
P. O. Box 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677 tel
707-996-0280 fax
http://www.wildsanctuary.com
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|