naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: GPS Datum

Subject: Re: GPS Datum
From: Walter Knapp <>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 21:09:58 -0400
richpeet wrote:
>
> I have read the requested info for documentation post but there still
> appears to be no standard to the GPS location datum used.
> Having had no response from research people I have contacted I have
> been using a format that I found most easy, but really don't care and
> find the US government using a different standard than the State.
> I use no min and secs and wgs 84.  If anyone could give a reason to
> standardize to something else I would be happy to switch.
>
> For example I document a location as:
> N45.46796 W93.70531 WGS84
>
> What would be the best most easily used standard and the most uniform
> way to write it down?

I always try and use the full degrees, minutes, seconds, topos are laid
out like that. As far as the Datum, it appears like USGS may be using
WGS84. They also recommend decimal degrees like you are using.

Walt



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • GPS Datum, richpeet
    • Re: GPS Datum, Walter Knapp <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU